Gamer Reviews — c'est les joueurs qui en parlent le mieux !

Syntheses generated by statistical aggregation of player reviews.

FREN
← Back to catalog
Steam specs (min / recommended)

Minimum: Système d'exploitation et processeur 64 bits nécessaires Système d'exploitation : 10 Processeur : Any x86_64 CPU Mémoire vive : 4 GB de mémoire Graphiques : Vulkan 1.3 support Espace disque : 200 MB d'espace disque disponible

Recommended: Système d'exploitation et processeur 64 bits nécessaires Système d'exploitation : 11 Processeur : Any x86_64 CPU Mémoire vive : 4 GB de mémoire Graphiques : Dedicated graphics card with Vulkan 1.3 support Espace disque : 200 MB d'espace disque disponible

Sir, We Have an Orc Problem

Niche cult favorite
⚔️ Compare View on Steam ↗
Released July 28, 2026
sample: 415 reviews posted after launch (155 AI-classified)
86/100
Player Score — positive reviews weighted by volume · Steam history: 87 % · 1,383 reviews (« Very Positive »)
➡️ Stable reception — recent reviews (30d): 88% positive vs 87% overall (1,391 recent reviews)
9,99€ 8,99€ -10%🛒 Compare on Instant Gamingaffiliate link

The tower‑defense loops keep players hooked, with the term appearing in 43 mentions. Steam sentiment is Very Positive, with 87% positive across 1,383 reviews and 88% positive since launch.

What it's about: Sir, We Have an Orc Problem est un jeu de tower defense incrémental dans lequel vous devez faire face à une horde impressionnante d'orcs. Réservez-leur un accueil à coups de balles, de bombes et de lasers !

In-game

Screenshot Sir, We Have an Orc ProblemScreenshot Sir, We Have an Orc ProblemScreenshot Sir, We Have an Orc ProblemScreenshot Sir, We Have an Orc ProblemScreenshot Sir, We Have an Orc ProblemScreenshot Sir, We Have an Orc Problem
« Super petit jeu... Le seul défaut c'est justement d'être trop petit: quelques niveaux de plus seraient le bienvenu. »
👍 anonymous review · 7 h played1
« très bon petit jeu, malheureusement trop court, 5 ou 6 niveaux de plus serait pas de trop »
👍 anonymous review · 10 h played
« Petit jeu fun, prix un peu élevé pour le contenu »
👍 anonymous review · 9 h played
« très bon jeu en espérant de nouvelles maps et de nouveaux armements »
👍 anonymous review · 23 h played
« Facile à prendre en main et fait passer le temps, donc que demander de plus »
👍 anonymous review · 11 h played
« Je pense sincérement que c'est le meilleur tower défense auquel j'ai joué »
👍 anonymous review · 11 h played
« Au prix auquel il est vendu c'est affligeant. vous avez 8 niveaux, temps de jeu sans afk moins de 4h. C'est une démo à la limite mais pas un jeu payant. »
👎 anonymous review · 8 h played
« good game concept, not enough content to justify the price tho, almost 100% it in 7 hours »
👎 anonymous review · 8 h played
« Idea is great. Look is horrible. Mid Game the scaling is stupidly grindy, killed all the fun. Would not recommend. »
👎 anonymous review · 2 h played
« Not worth the price. No skill in the game really, the progress is very locked behind grinding and running the scenarios over and over again. »
👎 anonymous review · 7 h played
« Its an overpriced grind zero skill towerdefense with annoying maps and no good strategy options, was just over 2 hours unfortunately »
👎 anonymous review · 8 h played
« Super fun game to 100%, would love to see a workshop implementation soon :) ! »
👍 anonymous review · 6 h played

In players' words

« Super petit jeu... Le seul défaut c'est justement d'être trop petit: quelques niveaux de plus seraient le bienvenu. »
👍 anonymous review · 7 h played1
« Au prix auquel il est vendu c'est affligeant. vous avez 8 niveaux, temps de jeu sans afk moins de 4h. C'est une démo à la limite mais pas un jeu payant. »
👎 anonymous review · 8 h played
« très bon petit jeu, malheureusement trop court, 5 ou 6 niveaux de plus serait pas de trop »
👍 anonymous review · 10 h played
« good game concept, not enough content to justify the price tho, almost 100% it in 7 hours »
👎 anonymous review · 8 h played
« Petit jeu fun, prix un peu élevé pour le contenu »
👍 anonymous review · 9 h played
« Idea is great. Look is horrible. Mid Game the scaling is stupidly grindy, killed all the fun. Would not recommend. »
👎 anonymous review · 2 h played
« très bon jeu en espérant de nouvelles maps et de nouveaux armements »
👍 anonymous review · 23 h played
« Not worth the price. No skill in the game really, the progress is very locked behind grinding and running the scenarios over and over again. »
👎 anonymous review · 7 h played
« Facile à prendre en main et fait passer le temps, donc que demander de plus »
👍 anonymous review · 11 h played
« Its an overpriced grind zero skill towerdefense with annoying maps and no good strategy options, was just over 2 hours unfortunately »
👎 anonymous review · 8 h played
« Je pense sincérement que c'est le meilleur tower défense auquel j'ai joué »
👍 anonymous review · 11 h played
« Super fun game to 100%, would love to see a workshop implementation soon :) ! »
👍 anonymous review · 6 h played

Anonymized excerpts from public Steam reviews — picked among those most voted "helpful" by the community.

What players say, by aspect

Positive Mixed Negative
Gameplay
86 % pos · n=110
Content / longevity
3 % pos · n=74
Value for money
49 % pos · n=39
Interface / UX
0 % pos · n=9
Graphics / art
0 % pos · n=3
Stability / bugs
100 % pos · n=2
Performance
0 % pos · n=1
Audio / music
0 % pos · n=1
Detailed data (table)
AspectMentionsPositiveMixedNegative
Gameplay11095411
Content / longevity7421557
Value for money3919515
Interface / UX9018
Graphics / art3003
Stability / bugs2200
Performance1001
Audio / music1001

Positive reviews by playtime

🎮 Players who like it have spent 7.8 h on median; those who dislike it: 6.5 h.

<2h
33 % (n=12)
2-10h
88 % (n=315)
10-25h
95 % (n=83)
>25h
100 % (n=5)

100% completion difficulty ("platinum")

6,7 % Moderate

of players have unlocked the rarest achievement — the upper bound of those who "100%'d" it. 11 achievements in total; the median achievement is unlocked by 15,3 % of players.

What creators say (YouTube)

This game on Twitch

Strengths

  • Gameplay earns 95 positive mentions out of 110 total, showing strong core mechanics.
  • Price is praised by 19 reviewers out of 39 mentions, indicating good value perception.
  • Bugs receive only positive feedback (2 positive mentions out of 2), suggesting a mostly stable experience.
  • The 2‑10 hour playtime bucket contains 315 reviews with 88% positivity, reflecting satisfaction among the majority of players.

Weaknesses

  • Content draws just 2 positive mentions out of 74, with 57 negative and 15 mixed, highlighting a perceived lack of depth.
  • Graphics are uniformly criticized (3 negative mentions, 0 positive), pointing to visual shortcomings.
  • UI suffers 8 negative mentions out of 9 total, indicating usability issues.
  • Performance is flagged negatively in the sole mention recorded, suggesting occasional optimization concerns.

Who is it for?

Fans of concise tower‑defense strategy games who appreciate solid gameplay and a low price will likely enjoy this title, especially those comfortable with shorter campaigns.

Is Sir, We Have an Orc Problem worth it in 2026?

Yes — player reception is very positive: 87% of 1,383 Steam reviews are positive (player score 86/100). Most-praised strength: Gameplay earns. Current price: 8,99€ (10% off).

Verdict

Sir, We Have an Orc Problem delivers engaging tower‑defense gameplay that resonates with most players, as reflected by high positive sentiment. However, the limited content, visual polish, and user‑interface problems may deter those seeking a more polished or content‑rich experience.

Display this score

This game's player score, as a badge you can embed on your site or page.

Show the badge and the embed code
Sir, We Have an Orc Problem: 86/100 by players — Gamer Reviews

Most frequent keywords

tower defense (43)court (19)contenu (11)prix (8)stratégie (8)amusement (7)defense (7)divertissant (7)trop court (6)niveaux (5)grind (5)addictif (5)

Similar games