
Steam specs (min / recommended)
Minimum: Système d'exploitation : Win10 64-bit Processeur : i5 Intel Core (7th Gen) Mémoire vive : 8 GB de mémoire Graphiques : GeForce GTX970 DirectX : Version 11 Réseau : connexion internet haut débit Espace disque : 75 GB d'espace disque disponible Carte son : Windows Compatible Audio Device Notes supplémentaires : HDD Supported, SSD Recommended
Recommended: Système d'exploitation : Win10 64-bit Processeur : i7 Intel Core (10th Gen) Mémoire vive : 8 GB de mémoire Graphiques : GeForce GTX1660 DirectX : Version 11 Réseau : connexion internet haut débit Espace disque : 75 GB d'espace disque disponible Carte son : Windows Compatible Audio Device Notes supplémentaires : HDD Supported, SSD Recommended
Zenless Zone Zero
The kinetic, high-octane combat loop is the primary hook, with long-term players showing immense dedication as 141 individuals logged over 25 hours. This engagement drives the game's overall performance, which currently maintains an 88% approval rating across 400 analyzed reviews since launch.
In-game






In players' words
Anonymized excerpts from public Steam reviews — picked among those most voted "helpful" by the community.
What players say, by aspect
Detailed data (table)
| Aspect | Mentions | Positive | Mixed | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gameplay | 57 | 51 | 1 | 5 |
| Content / longevity | 46 | 32 | 2 | 12 |
| Story / writing | 24 | 17 | 2 | 5 |
| Graphics / art | 13 | 12 | 0 | 1 |
| Audio / music | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 |
| Performance | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Value for money | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Stability / bugs | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Interface / UX | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
Positive reviews by playtime
🎮 Players who like it have spent 19 h on median; those who dislike it: 5 h.
What creators say (YouTube)
3 review videos analyzed: 1 positive2 mixed0 negative
Les joueurs Steam et les créateurs YouTube convergent sur l'appréciation générale du gameplay et des graphismes de Zenless Zone Zero, avec une majorité de commentaires positifs. Cependant, ils divergent sur l'évaluation de l'interface utilisateur (UI), les joueurs Steam étant très critiques tandis que les créateurs YouTube semblent moins concernés par ce problème. De plus, les créateurs YouTube saluent普遍ement la qualité audio, aspect peu commenté mais très positivement évalué sur YouTube.
This game on Twitch
Small streamers to support
Streams snapshot from 15/07 à 11h53
Popular clips
Strengths
- Fast-paced combat mechanics define the experience, earning 51 positive mentions out of 57.
- The visual aesthetic is widely praised, cited in 12 positive mentions out of 13.
- Engaging narrative delivery resonates with the community, securing 17 positive mentions out of 24.
- The breadth of available content satisfies most users, contributing 32 positive mentions out of 46.
Weaknesses
- Performance stability remains a concern, with 3 negative mentions out of 4.
- User interface navigation is a notable pain point, representing 3 negative mentions out of 3.
- Recurring bugs hinder the polish of the experience, accounting for 3 negative mentions out of 3.
- Progression and content pacing issues generated 12 negative mentions out of 46.
Who is it for?
Players who thrive on stylish action-RPG combat and are comfortable with gacha-based progression systems will feel right at home. It is an ideal pick for those seeking a long-term, content-rich live service title.
Verdict
The game succeeds by delivering a deeply satisfying combat engine that keeps its core audience hooked for dozens of hours. While minor technical frustrations and UI limitations occasionally dampen the experience, the vast majority of players remain firmly committed to the world.
Display this score
This game's player score, as a badge you can embed on your site or page.

💬 Discussion
A thought, a tip, a question? Drop a note (no account needed).