
Steam specs (min / recommended)
Minimum: Système d'exploitation et processeur 64 bits nécessaires Système d'exploitation : Windows 10 64 bits Processeur : Intel i3 8350K Mémoire vive : 8 GB de mémoire Graphiques : Geforce 1060 Espace disque : 25 GB d'espace disque disponible Notes supplémentaires : 1080p@30fps
Recommended: Système d'exploitation et processeur 64 bits nécessaires Système d'exploitation : Windows 10 64 bits Processeur : Intel i5 11400T Mémoire vive : 16 GB de mémoire Graphiques : Geforce 3060 Espace disque : 25 GB d'espace disque disponible Notes supplémentaires : 1440p@60fps
SpaceCraft
Three-quarters of players who stick around past the tutorial have logged over 25 hours, chasing the freedom this sandbox offers. Yet even veterans flag stuttering framerates and UI quirks that undercut the experience.
In-game






In players' words
Anonymized excerpts from public Steam reviews — picked among those most voted "helpful" by the community.
What players say, by aspect
Detailed data (table)
| Aspect | Mentions | Positive | Mixed | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gameplay | 79 | 46 | 6 | 27 |
| Content / longevity | 29 | 15 | 4 | 10 |
| Performance | 13 | 1 | 1 | 11 |
| Interface / UX | 12 | 0 | 0 | 12 |
| Multiplayer | 10 | 5 | 2 | 3 |
| Stability / bugs | 8 | 0 | 1 | 7 |
| Story / writing | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 |
| Graphics / art | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 |
| Value for money | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Audio / music | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
Positive reviews by playtime
🎮 Players who like it have spent 99 h on median; those who dislike it: 64 h.
What creators say (YouTube)
No indexed video for this game yet.
This game on Twitch
Small streamers to support
Streams snapshot from 15/07 à 12h11
Popular clips
Strengths
- Exploration and sandbox building shine: 46 positive mentions out of 79
- Players who push beyond 10 hours report rising satisfaction: 72% positive for >25h playtime
- Sound design earns universal praise: 3 positive mentions out of 3
- Multiplayer interactions draw cautious optimism: 5 positive mentions out of 10
Weaknesses
- Performance drags down the fun: only 1 positive mention out of 13
- UI frustrates as many as it helps: 12 negative mentions with zero positives
- Bugs plague sessions: 7 negative mentions with no positives
- Content pacing sparks grind fatigue: 11 mentions of 'grind' with 8 tied to frustration
Who is it for?
Fans of open-ended survival crafting who don’t mind trading polish for possibility. Those seeking a polished, story-driven experience should look elsewhere.
Verdict
A world brimming with potential that stumbles on execution. For the right audience, the trade-offs are worth it—but the technical and interface hurdles will deter others.
Display this score
This game's player score, as a badge you can embed on your site or page.

💬 Discussion
A thought, a tip, a question? Drop a note (no account needed).