Steam specs (min / recommended)
Minimum: Système d'exploitation : Windows 10 64-bit (22H2 or newer) Processeur : Intel Pentium G2020 / AMD A6-5400K Mémoire vive : 4096 MB de mémoire Graphiques : Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) / AMD Radeon HD 7540D DirectX : Version 11 Réseau : connexion internet haut débit Espace disque : 5120 MB d'espace disque disponible Carte son : DirectX Compatible Notes supplémentaires : No dedicated graphics card required; the game is fully playable on the minimum integrated processors listed above. Equivalent dedicated graphics cards supported: NVIDIA GeForce GT 430 (1 GB) / AMD Radeon HD 5450 (1 G
Recommended: Système d'exploitation : Windows 11 25H2 Processeur : AMD Ryzen 5 5600X / Intel Core i5-12400F Mémoire vive : 16384 MB de mémoire Graphiques : NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 / AMD Radeon RX 6600/ Intel Arc A580 DirectX : Version 12 Réseau : connexion internet haut débit Espace disque : 6 GB d'espace disque disponible Carte son : DirectX Compatible Notes supplémentaires : SSD recommended for optimal performance.
GOALS
Players who stick around for over 10 hours nearly double their approval rate, but first impressions are brutal: only 15 percent of under-2-hour sessions leave happy. The game’s identity crisis—loved for its niche ambitions yet haunted by unfinished feels—shines through in 42 positive mentions out of 100 since launch.
In-game
In players' words
Anonymized excerpts from public Steam reviews — picked among those most voted "helpful" by the community.
What players say, by aspect
Detailed data (table)
| Aspect | Mentions | Positive | Mixed | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gameplay | 107 | 37 | 6 | 64 |
| Value for money | 20 | 3 | 2 | 15 |
| Content / longevity | 19 | 4 | 2 | 13 |
| Performance | 14 | 5 | 0 | 9 |
| Multiplayer | 10 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
| Interface / UX | 8 | 1 | 0 | 7 |
| Stability / bugs | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| Graphics / art | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| Story / writing | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Warning signs flagged by players
Most recurring negative themes in reviews (automatic detection):
⚠️ Aggressive monetization · 11% of reviewsPositive reviews by playtime
🎮 Players who like it have spent 13 h on median; those who dislike it: 4.8 h.
What creators say (YouTube)
No indexed video for this game yet.
This game on Twitch
Popular streamers
Small streamers to support
Streams snapshot from 15/07 à 11h57
Popular clips
Strengths
- A small but vocal slice of veteran players find catharsis in the deeper hours: 57 positive mentions out of 82 among those logging more than 25 hours.
- Graphics draw quiet praise—2 positive mentions out of 3—though the chorus is tiny.
- Casual fun occasionally breaks through: 4 positive mentions out of 4 when players call it “amusant.”
Weaknesses
- Gameplay polarizes hard: 64 negative mentions out of 107 paint it as the dominant pain point.
- Price and content frustrate—15 negative versus 3 positive mentions on cost, 13 negative versus 4 positive on material provided.
- Multiplayer is unanimously reviled: 10 negative mentions with zero positives.
Who is it for?
Devoted completionists and players who tolerate rough edges for a quirky vision. Those demanding polish or multiplayer depth should look elsewhere.
Verdict
GOALS crafts a niche experiment that rewards patience, yet its rough launch and thin post-launch fixes keep most newcomers at arm’s length. If you’re chasing a bold, unfinished dream, you might be the audience—but temper expectations.
Display this score
This game's player score, as a badge you can embed on your site or page.
Show the badge and the embed code
💬 Discussion
A thought, a tip, a question? Drop a note (no account needed).