Minimum:
Système d'exploitation et processeur 64 bits nécessaires Système d'exploitation : Windows Processeur : 2.5 Mémoire vive : 8 GB de mémoire Graphiques : Intel Core i5-2400 @ 3.1 GHz or AMD FX-6300 @ 3.5 GHz or equivalent DirectX : Version 10 Espace disque : 4 GB d'espace disque disponible Notes supplémentaires : - Requires a 64-bit processor and operating system
Recommended: Système d'exploitation et processeur 64 bits nécessaires Système d'exploitation : Windows 10 Processeur : Intel Core i7-4770 @ 3.4 GHz or AMD Ryzen 5 1600 @ 3.2 GHz or equivalent Mémoire vive : 8 GB de mémoire Graphiques : NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 or AMD R9 290X (4GB VRAM with Shader Model 5.0 or better) Réseau : connexion internet haut débit Espace disque : 6 GB d'espace disque disponible Notes supplémentaires : Requires a 64-bit processor and operating system
Multiplayer mayhem is the name of the game: one in four Steam reviews mentions the chaotic, party-friendly matches that keep players coming back. That frenetic energy is backed by rock-solid numbers—95% of all reviews are positive, and post-release sentiment is nearly identical at 94% positive among 493 sampled reviews.
What it's about: Rounds est un rogue-lite en 1 contre 1 où chaque manche est plus intense que la précédente. Le perdant de chaque manche débloque des pouvoirs sensationnels pour améliorer son build et parvenir à vaincre son adversaire.
In-game
« If monkeys could talk, this would be the game they would eat. Eating, by the way, is very delicious, if you didn't know. This game has no eating whatsoever. That's why I play this game. Or else I might get daibtees. »👍 anonymous review · 5 h played321« I choose cards. I make my gun powerful. I shoot an atom bomb. Then all my friends get obliterated into dust. This is a great game. »👍 anonymous review · 53 h played11« Man make broken build, man fill screen with 400 bouncing bullets, man see FPS drop to single digit, computer hot, man happy, game good. (and that's just vanilla game. With mods it's just INSANELY G O A T E D) »👍 anonymous review · 69 h played111« Everyone I've shown this game to has gotten addicted to it (except my cousin. I beat his ass so bad he left a negative review and never played it again). »👍 anonymous review · 74 h played3« Very fun with friends, if your on mac it is almost impossible to mod, I still haven't found a way how. »👍 anonymous review · 14 h played1« Hell yeah, better with mods, basically like stick fight but with every aspect of it upgraded »👍 anonymous review · 5 h played1
« le jeu bug trop + j'ai perdu un ami a cause de ce jeu »👎 anonymous review · 9 h played« Non je ne recommande vraiment pas il casse des amitié, et sert juste de concours de paff entre pote, ce jeux ne vaux vraiment pas la peine, j'en ai perdu un doigts. »👎 anonymous review · 6 h played« Cant be a square, I love squares. Let me be a square, and i will be happy. »👎 anonymous review · 22 h played« cheaters ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ ruin this ♥♥♥♥ »👎 anonymous review · 0 h played« PLEASE GOD LET THIS GAME UPDATE »👎 anonymous review · 0 h played« its either a. nice competitive game to play in your free time, pretty calm b. BRO I CANT EVEN SEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! WHAT IS GOING ONNNNNNN »👍 anonymous review · 18 h played1
In players' words
« If monkeys could talk, this would be the game they would eat. Eating, by the way, is very delicious, if you didn't know. This game has no eating whatsoever. That's why I play this game. Or else I might get daibtees. »👍 anonymous review · 5 h played321« le jeu bug trop + j'ai perdu un ami a cause de ce jeu »👎 anonymous review · 9 h played« I choose cards. I make my gun powerful. I shoot an atom bomb. Then all my friends get obliterated into dust. This is a great game. »👍 anonymous review · 53 h played11« Non je ne recommande vraiment pas il casse des amitié, et sert juste de concours de paff entre pote, ce jeux ne vaux vraiment pas la peine, j'en ai perdu un doigts. »👎 anonymous review · 6 h played« Man make broken build, man fill screen with 400 bouncing bullets, man see FPS drop to single digit, computer hot, man happy, game good. (and that's just vanilla game. With mods it's just INSANELY G O A T E D) »👍 anonymous review · 69 h played111« Cant be a square, I love squares. Let me be a square, and i will be happy. »👎 anonymous review · 22 h played« Everyone I've shown this game to has gotten addicted to it (except my cousin. I beat his ass so bad he left a negative review and never played it again). »👍 anonymous review · 74 h played3« cheaters ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ ruin this ♥♥♥♥ »👎 anonymous review · 0 h played« Very fun with friends, if your on mac it is almost impossible to mod, I still haven't found a way how. »👍 anonymous review · 14 h played1« PLEASE GOD LET THIS GAME UPDATE »👎 anonymous review · 0 h played« Hell yeah, better with mods, basically like stick fight but with every aspect of it upgraded »👍 anonymous review · 5 h played1« its either a. nice competitive game to play in your free time, pretty calm b. BRO I CANT EVEN SEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! WHAT IS GOING ONNNNNNN »👍 anonymous review · 18 h played1
Anonymized excerpts from public Steam reviews — picked among those most voted "helpful" by the community.
What players say, by aspect
PositiveMixedNegative
Gameplay
85 % pos · n=131
Multiplayer
65 % pos · n=52
Content / longevity
20 % pos · n=20
Performance
29 % pos · n=7
Value for money
83 % pos · n=6
Stability / bugs
75 % pos · n=4
Graphics / art
33 % pos · n=3
Interface / UX
33 % pos · n=3
Audio / music
50 % pos · n=2
Detailed data (table)
Aspect
Mentions
Positive
Mixed
Negative
Gameplay
131
111
9
11
Multiplayer
52
34
5
13
Content / longevity
20
4
5
11
Performance
7
2
0
5
Value for money
6
5
0
1
Stability / bugs
4
3
0
1
Graphics / art
3
1
0
2
Interface / UX
3
1
0
2
Audio / music
2
1
0
1
Positive reviews by playtime
🎮 Players who like it have spent 14 h on median; those who dislike it: 7.5 h.
<2h
61 % (n=23)
2-10h
94 % (n=165)
10-25h
97 % (n=173)
>25h
97 % (n=132)
Fixed or still broken? Sentiment over time
➡️ Stable reception over time
% of positive reviews per month (months with ≥ 15 sample reviews).
of players have unlocked the rarest achievement — the upper bound of those who "100%'d" it. 24 achievements in total; the median achievement is unlocked by 13,7 % of players.
Gameplay is the standout strength: 111 positive mentions out of 131
Multiplayer shines—65% of related reviews glow about it (34 out of 52)
Nearly every long-term player loves it: 97% of those logging over 25 hours speak highly
Modding community thrives: 20 mentions of mods, with most referencing additions positively
Weaknesses
Performance stumbles: 5 out of 7 mentions call it a problem
Early content leaves some wanting: 11 out of 20 critical comments focus on lack of depth
UI sparks minor frustration: 2 of 3 mentions cite usability gripes
Who is it for?
ROUNDS is perfect for gamers who crave fast-paced, social chaos with friends or family, especially those who enjoy strategy-lite action and live for replayability. If you’ve ever wanted a game that feels tailor-made for wild multiplayer nights, this delivers.
Is ROUNDS worth it in 2026?
Overall yes, the community is won over: 95% of 43,789 Steam reviews are positive (player score 94/100). Most-praised strength: Gameplay is the standout strength. Current price: 5,49€.
Verdict
ROUNDS turns frantic multiplayer into the kind of addictive fun that keeps players glued for hours on end. Despite a few performance and content niggles, the overwhelming positivity—from 95% of nearly 44,000 reviews—proves this chaotic gem hits the right buttons. For action-loving groups who want a title that grows with them, it’s a no-brainer.
Is this synthesis accurate?
Display this score
This game's player score, as a badge you can embed on your site or page.
💬 Discussion
A thought, a tip, a question? Drop a note (no account needed).