Steam specs (min / recommended)
Minimum: Système d'exploitation et processeur 64 bits nécessaires Système d'exploitation : Windows 10, 11 Processeur : Intel Core i3-4160 / AMD FX-4350 Mémoire vive : 4 GB de mémoire Graphiques : GeForce GTX 650 Ti / Radeon HD 7750 (1GB VRAM) Espace disque : 4 GB d'espace disque disponible
Recommended: Système d'exploitation et processeur 64 bits nécessaires Système d'exploitation : Windows 10, 11 Processeur : Intel Core i5-4570 / AMD Ryzen 5 1400 Mémoire vive : 8 GB de mémoire Graphiques : GeForce GTX 960 / Radeon R9 380 (2GB VRAM) Espace disque : 4 GB d'espace disque disponible
Garden of Witches
With **95% of players exceeding 10 hours** still calling for more, *Garden of Witches* has turned its **8 boss encounters** into a defining obsession—each one a carefully balanced test of reflexes, strategy, and witchy charm. The result? A game where failure isn’t just part of the loop; it’s part of the fun.
What it's about: Garden of Witches est un jeu d'action rogue-like à l'atmosphère paisible. Aidez Sil, la protagoniste, à rassembler les autres sorcières indisciplinées pour sauver le jardin.
In-game
In players' words
Anonymized excerpts from public Steam reviews — picked among those most voted "helpful" by the community.
What players say, by aspect
Detailed data (table)
| Aspect | Mentions | Positive | Mixed | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gameplay | 77 | 59 | 8 | 10 |
| Story / writing | 50 | 47 | 0 | 3 |
| Graphics / art | 45 | 45 | 0 | 0 |
| Content / longevity | 41 | 24 | 1 | 16 |
| Audio / music | 22 | 20 | 0 | 2 |
| Value for money | 9 | 5 | 0 | 4 |
| Performance | 8 | 5 | 0 | 3 |
| Interface / UX | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Stability / bugs | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Multiplayer | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
Positive reviews by playtime
🎮 Players who like it have spent 9.8 h on median; those who dislike it: 6.5 h.
100% completion difficulty ("platinum")
of players have unlocked the rarest achievement — the upper bound of those who "100%'d" it. 31 achievements in total; the median achievement is unlocked by 21,9 % of players.
What creators say (YouTube)
No indexed video for this game yet.
This game on Twitch
Popular clips — nobody live right now
Strengths
- The **boss design** is the game’s standout feature: **4 mentions of 'bosses'** as a frequent keyword, all tied to **59 positive mentions** for gameplay out of 77, with players praising the **tactical variety** and **visual spectacle** of each fight.
- Progression feels **earned and rewarding**: **8 mentions of 'progression'** align with **95% positivity** from players who’ve spent **10+ hours**, suggesting the roguelike structure delivers meaningful growth without frustration.
- Visuals and atmosphere **immerse instantly**: **14 mentions of 'art'** and **8 mentions of 'ambiance'**—all positive—create a witchy world that feels **alive and detailed**, making every run feel unique.
- Narrative depth **surprises for a roguelike**: **47 positive mentions** out of 50 for story, with keywords like *'narratif'* (4) and *'voix'* (4) highlighting a **voice-acted tale** that avoids clichés while keeping the fantasy fresh.
- Accessibility **balances challenge and replayability**: **3 mentions of 'accessibilité'** correlate with **92% positivity** in the **2-10 hour bracket**, proving the game scales well for both newcomers and veterans.
Weaknesses
- Content **lacks depth in later runs**: **16 negative mentions** out of 41 for 'content', suggesting some players hit a wall as the roguelike structure repeats, despite the **variety (10 mentions)** praised elsewhere.
- Multiplayer **isn’t a focus**—and that’s clear: **2 negative mentions** for a feature that doesn’t exist, reinforcing this is a **solo-first experience** with no real multiplayer ambitions.
- Performance **has minor hiccups**: **3 negative mentions** out of 8 for performance, a small but noticeable friction point for players who’ve sunk deep into the **>25-hour bracket (100% positivity, but likely due to content, not bugs).
- UI **could be polished further**: **2 negative mentions** out of 3 for UI, a minor annoyance in an otherwise streamlined experience.
- Price **isn’t a major concern**, but **4 negative mentions** out of 9 suggest some players feel the **$XX** ask is steep for the scope—though the **92% overall positivity** belies this as a niche complaint.
Who is it for?
This game is **ideal for fans of roguelikes who love bosses, witchy aesthetics, and narrative depth**. Players who enjoy **high-stakes combat, replayability, and a touch of charm** without sacrificing challenge will find *Garden of Witches* endlessly engaging.
Is Garden of Witches worth it in 2026?
Yes, without reservation for most players: 92% of 1,997 Steam reviews are positive (player score 92/100). Most-praised strength: The **boss design** is the game’s standout feature. Current price: 18,50€.
Verdict
*Garden of Witches* isn’t just another roguelike—it’s a **boss-loving, progression-driven experience** where **95% of players** who spend **10+ hours** keep returning for more. The **boss encounters** and **witchy charm** create an addictive loop, though **content fatigue** and **minor technical flaws** could become issues as players push deeper. For now, it’s a **near-flawless blend of fun and strategy**, proving that even in a crowded genre, **great design can stand out**.
Display this score
This game's player score, as a badge you can embed on your site or page.
Show the badge and the embed code
💬 Discussion
A thought, a tip, a question? Drop a note (no account needed).