Steam specs (min / recommended)
Minimum: Système d'exploitation *: Windows 7 SP1+ Processeur : 1.8 GHz Mémoire vive : 4 GB de mémoire Graphiques : Intel HD Graphics 4400 DirectX : Version 10 Espace disque : 408 MB d'espace disque disponible
Recommended: Système d'exploitation : Windows 10 Processeur : 2.4 GHz Mémoire vive : 4 GB de mémoire Graphiques : GeForce GTX 670 (2048 MB) DirectX : Version 10 Espace disque : 408 MB d'espace disque disponible
Path of Giants
Players breeze through these tranquil snow-covered trails in a tidy two to ten hours, leaving behind 378 positive notes in that sweet spot alone. Backed by 97 percent positive reviews across 434 post-launch assessments, this cozy trek has captured an overwhelmingly positive global history of 97 percent across 1007 total reviews.
What it's about: Path of Giants est une aventure de puzzle sereine qui suit trois adorables explorateurs pendant qu'ils prennent sur une montagne glacée pleine d'épreuves à la recherche d'un trésor perdu. Contrôlez trois personnages, utilisez leur travail d'équipe, ne laisser personne de côté et, espérons-le, trouver de l'or!
In-game
In players' words
Anonymized excerpts from public Steam reviews — picked among those most voted "helpful" by the community.
What players say, by aspect
Detailed data (table)
| Aspect | Mentions | Positive | Mixed | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gameplay | 169 | 151 | 11 | 7 |
| Graphics / art | 47 | 45 | 1 | 1 |
| Content / longevity | 34 | 18 | 3 | 13 |
| Audio / music | 33 | 29 | 4 | 0 |
| Story / writing | 28 | 11 | 0 | 17 |
| Performance | 23 | 14 | 0 | 9 |
| Interface / UX | 17 | 9 | 1 | 7 |
| Value for money | 13 | 10 | 0 | 3 |
| Multiplayer | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| Stability / bugs | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
Positive reviews by playtime
🎮 Players who like it have spent 4.2 h on median; those who dislike it: 54 min.
🪤 54 % of negative reviews come from players who left in under 2h — the game often disappoints right away.
Fixed or still broken? Sentiment over time
% of positive reviews per month (months with ≥ 15 sample reviews).
100% completion difficulty ("platinum")
of players have unlocked the rarest achievement — the upper bound of those who "100%'d" it. 17 achievements in total; the median achievement is unlocked by 27,3 % of players.
What creators say (YouTube)
No indexed video for this game yet.
This game on Twitch
Popular clips — nobody live right now
Strengths
- Core mechanics and spatial challenges shine brightly, driving 151 positive mentions out of 169 total feedback entries.
- Art direction and visual presentation earn near-universal praise with 45 positive mentions out of 47.
- Soundscapes and soothing audio design create a relaxing atmosphere, backed by 29 positive mentions out of 33.
- Overall pacing fits the intended gentle challenge, reflected in 10 positive mentions out of 13 regarding the price-to-content ratio.
Weaknesses
- Narrative depth misses the mark for some, logging 17 negative mentions out of 28.
- Content volume feels brief, generating 13 negative mentions out of 34.
- Technical performance and interface navigation draw occasional criticism, with 9 negative mentions out of 23 for performance and 7 negative mentions out of 17 for the user interface.
Who is it for?
Casual puzzle enthusiasts and relaxation seekers looking for a charming, bite-sized cooperative adventure will feel right at home.
Is Path of Giants worth it in 2026?
Yes, without reservation for most players: 97% of 1,007 Steam reviews are positive (player score 96/100). Most-praised strength: Core mechanics and spatial challenges shine brightly, driving. Current price: 1,47€ (80% off).
Verdict
Path of Giants delivers a serene and visually delightful puzzle journey that easily justifies its runtime despite minor narrative shortcomings. With 97 percent of players giving it a thumbs-up after launch, it remains a charmingly reliable escape.
Display this score
This game's player score, as a badge you can embed on your site or page.
Show the badge and the embed code
💬 Discussion
A thought, a tip, a question? Drop a note (no account needed).