Gamer Reviews — c'est les joueurs qui en parlent le mieux !

Syntheses generated by statistical aggregation of player reviews.

FREN
← Back to catalog
Steam specs (min / recommended)

Minimum: Système d'exploitation et processeur 64 bits nécessaires Système d'exploitation : Windows 10 Processeur : Intel i5-12400F / AMD Ryzen 7 5800X Mémoire vive : 16 GB de mémoire Graphiques : NVIDIA GeForce 2060 / AMD Radeon 5600 XT DirectX : Version 12 Espace disque : 60 GB d'espace disque disponible

Recommended: Système d'exploitation et processeur 64 bits nécessaires Système d'exploitation : Windows 11 Processeur : Intel i5-12400F / AMD Ryzen 7 5800X Mémoire vive : 16 GB de mémoire Graphiques : NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 / AMD Radeon 6750 XT DirectX : Version 12 Espace disque : 60 GB d'espace disque disponible

Online: 404

Cold reception
⚔️ Compare View on Steam ↗
Released October 21, 2026
sample: 335 reviews posted after launch (180 AI-classified)
52/100
Player Score — positive reviews weighted by volume · Steam history: 56 % · 335 reviews (« Mixed »)
➡️ Stable reception — recent reviews (30d): 56% positive vs 49% overall (375 recent reviews)
18,25€ 15,51€ -15%🛒 Compare on Instant Gamingaffiliate link

Endurance is the true test of this action survival experience, where those who push past the early hour hurdles find a remarkably sticky adventure. Across 335 reviews since launch, the title holds a 56 percent positive rating, fueled almost entirely by players who stay for the long haul.

What it's about: Un simulateur de survie en monde ouvert où même les vétérans du genre devront repenser complètement leur manière de survivre et d’interagir avec le monde. Jouez en solo ou entre amis, suivez l’histoire ou explorez librement — mais surtout, n’oubliez pas votre gadget le plus précieux.

In-game

Screenshot Online: 404Screenshot Online: 404Screenshot Online: 404Screenshot Online: 404Screenshot Online: 404Screenshot Online: 404
« les mauvais joueurs son pas content... sauf que le jeux vient de sortir en beta il faut du temps »
👍 anonymous review · Oct 2026 · 10 h played
« Trés bon jeux pour un accès anticipé »
👍 anonymous review · Oct 2026 · 16 h played
« Le jeu est plaisant et assez complet pour une phase d'accès anticipé, beaucoup de points sont a améliorer mais le jeu est cool. »
👍 anonymous review · Oct 2026 · 11 h played
« Bon jeu, des devs très réactifs sur la correction de bug »
👍 anonymous review · Oct 2026 · 9 h played
« A diamond in the rough. So far I have been enjoying the game. Needs some work, that is understandable due to early access. I like some of the concepts. Just needs time. I predict it will be in the same popularity as Rust. »
👍 anonymous review · Oct 2026 · 23 h played
« Early Access? its good so far. dont let the negatives stop you from playing it. »
👍 anonymous review · Oct 2026 · 3 h played
« 56 GB OF FOREST AND GREEN CAR AND AMBULANCE. »
👎 anonymous review · Oct 2026 · 1 h played
« Can't recommend this at all. The Map is Tiny. Looting is always the same, basically no variety at all, and that in almost 60GB. »
👎 anonymous review · Oct 2026 · 1 h played
« Cool concept but the game needs a lot of work I'll come back later. »
👎 anonymous review · Oct 2026 · 7 h played
« Terrible just straight up terrible »
👎 anonymous review · Oct 2026 · 0 h played
« do not buy this game wasted 40 minutes of my time complete dog shit. the trailer and gameplay screenshots advertised do not match the gameplay hardly anything to loot very weird interaction with items »
👎 anonymous review · Oct 2026 · 1 h played
« Not bad for as early as it is. Unique parts to the survival genre, gunplay feels fun »
👍 anonymous review · Oct 2026 · 0 h played

In players' words

« les mauvais joueurs son pas content... sauf que le jeux vient de sortir en beta il faut du temps »
👍 anonymous review · Oct 2026 · 10 h played
« 56 GB OF FOREST AND GREEN CAR AND AMBULANCE. »
👎 anonymous review · Oct 2026 · 1 h played
« Trés bon jeux pour un accès anticipé »
👍 anonymous review · Oct 2026 · 16 h played
« Can't recommend this at all. The Map is Tiny. Looting is always the same, basically no variety at all, and that in almost 60GB. »
👎 anonymous review · Oct 2026 · 1 h played
« Le jeu est plaisant et assez complet pour une phase d'accès anticipé, beaucoup de points sont a améliorer mais le jeu est cool. »
👍 anonymous review · Oct 2026 · 11 h played
« Cool concept but the game needs a lot of work I'll come back later. »
👎 anonymous review · Oct 2026 · 7 h played
« Bon jeu, des devs très réactifs sur la correction de bug »
👍 anonymous review · Oct 2026 · 9 h played
« Terrible just straight up terrible »
👎 anonymous review · Oct 2026 · 0 h played
« A diamond in the rough. So far I have been enjoying the game. Needs some work, that is understandable due to early access. I like some of the concepts. Just needs time. I predict it will be in the same popularity as Rust. »
👍 anonymous review · Oct 2026 · 23 h played
« do not buy this game wasted 40 minutes of my time complete dog shit. the trailer and gameplay screenshots advertised do not match the gameplay hardly anything to loot very weird interaction with items »
👎 anonymous review · Oct 2026 · 1 h played
« Early Access? its good so far. dont let the negatives stop you from playing it. »
👍 anonymous review · Oct 2026 · 3 h played
« Not bad for as early as it is. Unique parts to the survival genre, gunplay feels fun »
👍 anonymous review · Oct 2026 · 0 h played

Anonymized excerpts from public Steam reviews — picked among those most voted "helpful" by the community.

What players say, by aspect

Positive Mixed Negative
Gameplay
61 % pos · n=137
Performance
37 % pos · n=75
Stability / bugs
48 % pos · n=31
Content / longevity
60 % pos · n=30
Story / writing
88 % pos · n=16
Interface / UX
38 % pos · n=16
Graphics / art
47 % pos · n=15
Multiplayer
60 % pos · n=5
Audio / music
0 % pos · n=3
Value for money
67 % pos · n=3
Detailed data (table)
AspectMentionsPositiveMixedNegative
Gameplay13783351
Performance7528047
Stability / bugs3115115
Content / longevity3018012
Story / writing161402
Interface / UX166010
Graphics / art15708
Multiplayer5302
Audio / music3003
Value for money3201

Positive reviews by playtime

🎮 Players who like it have spent 5.2 h on median; those who dislike it: 54 min.

🪤 76 % of negative reviews come from players who left in under 2h — the game often disappoints right away.

<2h
28 % (n=155)
2-10h
73 % (n=112)
10-25h
92 % (n=48)
>25h
95 % (n=20)

100% completion difficulty ("platinum")

97,8 % Accessible

of players have unlocked the rarest achievement — the upper bound of those who "100%'d" it. 1 achievements in total; the median achievement is unlocked by 97,8 % of players.

What creators say (YouTube)

2 review videos analyzed: 1 positive0 mixed1 negative

Les créateurs YouTube et les joueurs Steam partagent un constat mitigé sur le gameplay et le contenu, oscillant entre bonnes idées et exécution perfectible. Cependant, là où les vidéastes se montrent divisés dans leurs verdicts globaux, la communauté Steam pointe plus clairement du doigt de réels soucis de performance et d'interface. Rappelons que le faible échantillon de vidéos constitue une simple tendance et non une statistique absolue.

Gameplay
50 % pos · n=2
Content / longevity
50 % pos · n=2
Story / writing
100 % pos · n=1
Graphics / art
0 % pos · n=1
Stability / bugs
0 % pos · n=1

See Online: 404 videos on YouTube →

This game on Twitch

Strengths

  • Dedication pays off tremendously, backed by 44 positive mentions out of 48 in the 10-25 hour bracket, and 19 positive mentions out of 20 for playtime exceeding 25 hours.
  • The core mechanics hit their stride for many, registering 83 positive mentions out of 137 regarding gameplay.
  • Narrative elements land well with the community, securing 14 positive mentions out of 16 for the story.
  • World content shows promise, indicated by 18 positive mentions out of 30.

Weaknesses

  • The initial threshold is punishing, reflected by 112 negative mentions out of 155 from players with under two hours of playtime.
  • Technical stability falters under pressure, accumulating 47 negative mentions out of 75 specifically targeting performance.
  • Interface design creates friction, bringing in 10 negative mentions out of 16 regarding the user interface.
  • Visual assets divide the community evenly, marked by 8 negative mentions out of 15 for graphics.

Who is it for?

Patient multiplayer survival veterans and explorers willing to weather a rough launch phase will discover a deep, rewarding commitment here.

Is Online: 404 worth it in 2026?

It depends — the community is divided: 56% of 335 Steam reviews are positive (player score 52/100). Most-praised strength: Dedication pays off tremendously, backed by. Current price: 15,51€ (15% off).

Verdict

Online: 404 is a diamond in the rough that demands resilience from its players before revealing its true worth. With a steady 56 percent approval rating post-release, it succeeds primarily as a long-term investment for those who look past severe early optimization hurdles.

Display this score

This game's player score, as a badge you can embed on your site or page.

Show the badge and the embed code
Online: 404: 52/100 by players — Gamer Reviews

Most frequent keywords

early access (63)bugs (31)early-access (29)survival (23)potential (20)early_access (18)gameplay (17)contenu (12)optimisation (9)performance (8)developers (7)zombie (7)

Similar games