Minimum:
Système d'exploitation : Windows 10 or later Processeur : Intel Core i5 or equivalent Graphiques : Desktop Nvidia GTX 1050 4GB or equivalent (integrated GPUs/lower spec mobile laptop GPUs not supported)
Recommended: Système d'exploitation : Windows 11 Processeur : Desktop Intel Core i9 or equivalent Graphiques : Desktop Nvidia 2070 8GB or equivalent
The shared workspace of abbey administration pulls entire groups together seamlessly, with 43 positive mentions dedicated entirely to the multiplayer cooperative loop. Steam players have fully embraced this simulation since its September 2026 launch, resulting in a staggering 98 percent positive rating across 132 reviews.
What it's about: A game about organizing, stacking and remembering where you put hundreds of books in a cozy-creepy medieval library. Play solo or with up to three fellow monks.
In-game
« So much fun and cozy. I can see this being chill for solo but my duo and I like playing it together <3 10/10 »👍 anonymous review · Sep 2026 · 5 h played1« Don't listen to Ruin,, she is a slave driver and beats me if books get damaged at all.. ,,,, so many spiders,.,, ( game is good tho) »👍 anonymous review · Sep 2026 · 6 h played1« This game is pretty, fun to play with a friend, and only a little bit scary (optionally). »👍 anonymous review · Sep 2026 · 6 h played« Fun little game! Definitely recommend co-op. Only a few hours of gameplay, but well worth the $8! »👍 anonymous review · Sep 2026 · 3 h played
« eh... plays like a shop simulator. thought it would be like Arcane Library »👎 anonymous review · Sep 2026 · 0 h played« i bought this game and then immediately played it for almost 4 hours straight. i love it so much. the ability to turn certain enemies on and off is a lifesaver. 10/10 and you can pat the cat ^_^ »👍 anonymous review · Sep 2026 · 6 h played« Brilliant game! Well-balanced gameplay. Best for play with your significant other. »👍 anonymous review · Sep 2026 · 12 h played« no silly review with this one, i really enjoy how the settings allow YOU to select how you want the gameplay to be. relaxed or not, easy W »👍 anonymous review · Sep 2026 · 2 h played
In players' words
« So much fun and cozy. I can see this being chill for solo but my duo and I like playing it together <3 10/10 »👍 anonymous review · Sep 2026 · 5 h played1« eh... plays like a shop simulator. thought it would be like Arcane Library »👎 anonymous review · Sep 2026 · 0 h played« Don't listen to Ruin,, she is a slave driver and beats me if books get damaged at all.. ,,,, so many spiders,.,, ( game is good tho) »👍 anonymous review · Sep 2026 · 6 h played1« i bought this game and then immediately played it for almost 4 hours straight. i love it so much. the ability to turn certain enemies on and off is a lifesaver. 10/10 and you can pat the cat ^_^ »👍 anonymous review · Sep 2026 · 6 h played« This game is pretty, fun to play with a friend, and only a little bit scary (optionally). »👍 anonymous review · Sep 2026 · 6 h played« Brilliant game! Well-balanced gameplay. Best for play with your significant other. »👍 anonymous review · Sep 2026 · 12 h played« Fun little game! Definitely recommend co-op. Only a few hours of gameplay, but well worth the $8! »👍 anonymous review · Sep 2026 · 3 h played« no silly review with this one, i really enjoy how the settings allow YOU to select how you want the gameplay to be. relaxed or not, easy W »👍 anonymous review · Sep 2026 · 2 h played
Anonymized excerpts from public Steam reviews — picked among those most voted "helpful" by the community.
What players say, by aspect
PositiveMixedNegative
Gameplay
94 % pos · n=99
Multiplayer
100 % pos · n=43
Content / longevity
79 % pos · n=39
Interface / UX
75 % pos · n=20
Story / writing
95 % pos · n=19
Graphics / art
100 % pos · n=14
Audio / music
80 % pos · n=10
Performance
78 % pos · n=9
Value for money
71 % pos · n=7
Stability / bugs
0 % pos · n=6
Detailed data (table)
Aspect
Mentions
Positive
Mixed
Negative
Gameplay
99
93
5
1
Multiplayer
43
43
0
0
Content / longevity
39
31
0
8
Interface / UX
20
15
0
5
Story / writing
19
18
0
1
Graphics / art
14
14
0
0
Audio / music
10
8
0
2
Performance
9
7
0
2
Value for money
7
5
0
2
Stability / bugs
6
0
1
5
Positive reviews by playtime
<2h
89 % (n=18)
2-10h
100 % (n=93)
10-25h
100 % (n=21)
100% completion difficulty ("platinum")
8 %Moderate
of players have unlocked the rarest achievement — the upper bound of those who "100%'d" it. 51 achievements in total; the median achievement is unlocked by 45,9 % of players.
Cooperative organization shines brightly, backed by 43 positive mentions out of 43 regarding multiplayer.
Core mechanics delight the community, resulting in 93 positive mentions out of 99 for gameplay.
Visual presentation hits the mark with 14 positive mentions out of 14 for graphics.
Narrative elements engage readers effectively, supported by 18 positive mentions out of 19 for story.
Weaknesses
Interface hurdles frustrate users, drawing 5 negative mentions out of 20 concerning the user interface.
Technical glitches disrupt sessions occasionally, evidenced by 5 negative mentions out of 6 regarding bugs.
Content depth leaves some wanting more, registering 8 negative mentions out of 39 for overall content.
Who is it for?
Groups of friends looking for a lighthearted, highly cooperative simulation experience centered around cozy organizational tasks will find plenty to love here.
Is Monk Took Book worth it in 2026?
Overall yes, the community is won over: 98% of 132 Steam reviews are positive (player score 95/100). Most-praised strength: Cooperative organization shines brightly, backed by. Current price: 8,09€ (10% off).
Verdict
Monk Took Book proves to be a remarkably stable and universally appreciated cooperative title, with all 132 post-release reviews cementing its status as a must-play. Aside from minor interface adjustments and bug fixes, the simulation delivers an overwhelmingly satisfying experience.
Is this synthesis accurate?
Display this score
This game's player score, as a badge you can embed on your site or page.
💬 Discussion
A thought, a tip, a question? Drop a note (no account needed).