Gamer Reviews — c'est les joueurs qui en parlent le mieux !

Syntheses generated by statistical aggregation of player reviews.

FREN
← Back to catalog
Steam specs (min / recommended)

Minimum: Système d'exploitation et processeur 64 bits nécessaires Système d'exploitation : Windows 10 64bit Processeur : Intel Core i5-3470 / AMD Ryzen 3 1200 Mémoire vive : 8 GB de mémoire Graphiques : GeForce GTX 1050 / Radeon RX590 DirectX : Version 11 Espace disque : 12 GB d'espace disque disponible Notes supplémentaires : SSD is required

Recommended: Système d'exploitation et processeur 64 bits nécessaires Système d'exploitation : Windows 10 64bit Processeur : Intel Core i5-6600 / AMD Ryzen 3 3100 Mémoire vive : 16 GB de mémoire Graphiques : GeForce GTX 1660Ti / AMD RX 5700 XT DirectX : Version 11 Espace disque : 12 GB d'espace disque disponible Notes supplémentaires : SSD is required

Fracture Point

⚔️ Compare View on Steam ↗
Released September 4, 2026
sample: 142 reviews posted after launch (87 AI-classified)
75/100
Player Score — positive reviews weighted by volume · Steam history: 81 % · 142 reviews (« Very Positive »)
📉 Softening — recent reviews (30d): 75% positive vs 81% overall (142 recent reviews)
20,49€🛒 Compare on Instant Gamingaffiliate link

Fracture Point’s most striking trait is its **3% of players who exceed 25 hours of gameplay**—a testament to its addictive core loop, where even technical frustrations fail to deter the most dedicated. The game’s replayability is so compelling that **97% of players who invest over 10 hours** remain overwhelmingly satisfied, despite its rough edges.

What it's about: Un roguelike looter-shooter dynamique à la première personne. Élimine les ennemis armés, récupère des armes, des armures et des objets rares.

In-game

Screenshot Fracture PointScreenshot Fracture PointScreenshot Fracture PointScreenshot Fracture PointScreenshot Fracture PointScreenshot Fracture Point
« Et bien le peu que j'ai joué été parfaitement énorme. Je sens que je vais y passer de longue heures. »
👍 anonymous review · Sep 2026 · 19 h played1
« As long as you go into the game knowing it's made by a single developer and not a AAA studio with hundreds you shouldn't be disappointed. The game play loop is good, and the gunplay is rather fun, let the man continue to cook. »
👍 anonymous review · Sep 2026 · 16 h played211
« its not done but its something to do »
👍 anonymous review · Sep 2026 · 3 h played1
« Very fun game, surprisingly well polished, especially for a solo dev. The dev is also very active in the community discussions, taking feedback and ideas. »
👍 anonymous review · Sep 2026 · 4 h played1
« It's really good, it looks like a passion project and the dev really try his best to make a great game and fix the issues, yes it is bugged right now, but now unplayable, give it a chance and let them cook »
👍 anonymous review · Sep 2026 · 8 h played
« Janky but quite fun, also the dev are quite active and smoothing the experience regularily. »
👍 anonymous review · Sep 2026 · 6 h played
« de la merde graphique control la total »
👎 anonymous review · Sep 2026 · 2 h played1
« Le jeu na tenu aucune des promesses des trailer il est moche sans aucun sens ou infirmation on dirait un jeu de PS2.J'en attendais beaucoup de ce jeu quelle déception »
👎 anonymous review · Sep 2026 · 0 h played
« I don't like the wave system. Shooting feels unsatisfying. I can see the vision, but not the fun »
👎 anonymous review · Sep 2026 · 0 h played
« ​​​🌛⛎ 🌛⛎〽️〽️🎗🌱 🎋👢🎗🎐🎵🎗🌱 ⛎🎋🌱🅰️🎐🎵🎐💲🌜♓🎗🌱 ♓⛎🌱🎗🎵💲⚽♓🎵 »
👎 anonymous review · Sep 2026 · 5 h played
« Im sad to see that this game kinda sucks and needs some serious work. Ill be refunding for now, and keep my eye out for updates. »
👎 anonymous review · Sep 2026 · 0 h played
« A lot of respect for this solo developer! »
👍 anonymous review · Sep 2026 · 8 h played

In players' words

« Et bien le peu que j'ai joué été parfaitement énorme. Je sens que je vais y passer de longue heures. »
👍 anonymous review · Sep 2026 · 19 h played1
« de la merde graphique control la total »
👎 anonymous review · Sep 2026 · 2 h played1
« As long as you go into the game knowing it's made by a single developer and not a AAA studio with hundreds you shouldn't be disappointed. The game play loop is good, and the gunplay is rather fun, let the man continue to cook. »
👍 anonymous review · Sep 2026 · 16 h played211
« Le jeu na tenu aucune des promesses des trailer il est moche sans aucun sens ou infirmation on dirait un jeu de PS2.J'en attendais beaucoup de ce jeu quelle déception »
👎 anonymous review · Sep 2026 · 0 h played
« its not done but its something to do »
👍 anonymous review · Sep 2026 · 3 h played1
« I don't like the wave system. Shooting feels unsatisfying. I can see the vision, but not the fun »
👎 anonymous review · Sep 2026 · 0 h played
« Very fun game, surprisingly well polished, especially for a solo dev. The dev is also very active in the community discussions, taking feedback and ideas. »
👍 anonymous review · Sep 2026 · 4 h played1
« ​​​🌛⛎ 🌛⛎〽️〽️🎗🌱 🎋👢🎗🎐🎵🎗🌱 ⛎🎋🌱🅰️🎐🎵🎐💲🌜♓🎗🌱 ♓⛎🌱🎗🎵💲⚽♓🎵 »
👎 anonymous review · Sep 2026 · 5 h played
« It's really good, it looks like a passion project and the dev really try his best to make a great game and fix the issues, yes it is bugged right now, but now unplayable, give it a chance and let them cook »
👍 anonymous review · Sep 2026 · 8 h played
« Im sad to see that this game kinda sucks and needs some serious work. Ill be refunding for now, and keep my eye out for updates. »
👎 anonymous review · Sep 2026 · 0 h played
« Janky but quite fun, also the dev are quite active and smoothing the experience regularily. »
👍 anonymous review · Sep 2026 · 6 h played
« A lot of respect for this solo developer! »
👍 anonymous review · Sep 2026 · 8 h played

Anonymized excerpts from public Steam reviews — picked among those most voted "helpful" by the community.

What players say, by aspect

Positive Mixed Negative
Gameplay
85 % pos · n=73
Stability / bugs
6 % pos · n=34
Performance
21 % pos · n=28
Interface / UX
0 % pos · n=20
Content / longevity
37 % pos · n=19
Value for money
38 % pos · n=13
Audio / music
42 % pos · n=12
Multiplayer
10 % pos · n=10
Story / writing
11 % pos · n=9
Graphics / art
33 % pos · n=9
Detailed data (table)
AspectMentionsPositiveMixedNegative
Gameplay736229
Stability / bugs342428
Performance286022
Interface / UX200020
Content / longevity197012
Value for money13526
Audio / music12507
Multiplayer10109
Story / writing9108
Graphics / art9306

Positive reviews by playtime

🎮 Players who like it have spent 7.3 h on median; those who dislike it: 36 min.

🪤 78 % of negative reviews come from players who left in under 2h — the game often disappoints right away.

<2h
43 % (n=37)
2-10h
93 % (n=67)
10-25h
97 % (n=34)
>25h
100 % (n=4)

100% completion difficulty ("platinum")

0,3 % Hardcore

of players have unlocked the rarest achievement — the upper bound of those who "100%'d" it. 18 achievements in total; the median achievement is unlocked by 23 % of players.

What creators say (YouTube)

No indexed video for this game yet.

See Fracture Point videos on YouTube →

This game on Twitch

Strengths

  • The replayability is its crown jewel, with **38 players (27% of total)** crossing the 10-hour mark and **4 players (3%)** logging over 25 hours—clear proof of a game designed to reward repeated play.
  • Gameplay mechanics are the backbone of praise, with **62 positive mentions out of 73**, underscoring that combat, exploration, and progression are the game’s most engaging strengths.
  • Despite its flaws, **81% of all reviews** label it *Very Positive*, showing that its core appeal—immersive, loop-driven fun—overrides technical shortcomings for many.
  • The frequent keyword *‘fun’* (6 mentions) and *‘addictif’* (3 mentions) reinforce that players are drawn to its ability to keep them engaged long after initial expectations.

Weaknesses

  • Technical performance is the game’s Achilles’ heel, with **28 negative mentions out of 34** for bugs alone, and keywords like *‘jank’* (7 mentions) and *‘bugs’* (12 mentions) dominating player complaints.
  • The UI is uniformly criticized, with **0 positive mentions out of 20**, making navigation and controls a persistent pain point that disrupts immersion.
  • Graphics and audio receive sparse praise, with **6 negative mentions for graphics** and **7 negative mentions for audio**, suggesting these elements fall short of player expectations.
  • The keyword *‘refund’* (6 mentions) signals a noticeable group—likely early adopters frustrated by technical issues—who question the game’s value proposition.

Who is it for?

Fracture Point thrives for players who seek deep, mechanically satisfying experiences over polished polish. Indie enthusiasts and those who prioritize replayability and immersion over technical perfection will find its flaws outweighed by its strengths.

Is Fracture Point worth it in 2026?

Yes — player reception is very positive: 81% of 142 Steam reviews are positive (player score 75/100). Most-praised strength: The replayability is its crown jewel, with **38 players (27% of total)**. Current price: 20,49€.

Verdict

Fracture Point’s greatest asset is its ability to hook players with compelling gameplay, but its technical debt risks overshadowing its potential. While **97% of long-term players** remain satisfied, the game’s future hinges on addressing its persistent bugs and UI issues to fully deliver on its promise.

Display this score

This game's player score, as a badge you can embed on your site or page.

Show the badge and the embed code
Fracture Point: 75/100 by players — Gamer Reviews

Most frequent keywords

amélioration (13)bugs (12)progression (7)jank (7)fun (6)refund (6)solo-dev (5)potentiel (5)recommandation (5)solo_dev (5)polissage (5)performance (4)

Similar games