Gamer Reviews — c'est les joueurs qui en parlent le mieux !

Syntheses generated by statistical aggregation of player reviews.

FREN
← Back to catalog
Steam specs (min / recommended)

Minimum: Système d'exploitation et processeur 64 bits nécessaires Système d'exploitation : Requires a 64-bit processor and operating system Mémoire vive : 256 MB de mémoire Espace disque : 256 MB d'espace disque disponible

Recommended: Système d'exploitation et processeur 64 bits nécessaires

A=B

Niche cult favorite
⚔️ Compare View on Steam ↗
Released March 29, 2022
sample: 403 reviews posted after launch (91 AI-classified)
91/100
Player Score — positive reviews weighted by volume · Steam history: 95 % · 929 reviews (« Overwhelmingly Positive »)
5,19€ 3,63€ -30%🛒 Compare on Instant Gamingaffiliate link

Players sink dozens of hours into building lines of code, with engagement soaring as playtime climbs from a modest 75 percent approval under two hours to an impressive 97 percent among veterans with over 25 hours. Overall, the title maintains an Overwhelmingly Positive standing backed by 95 percent of its 929 global reviews and a steady 93 percent approval across 403 sampled post-release evaluations.

What it's about: A=B is a programming puzzle game with only one instruction: A=B, which means replacing A with B.

In-game

Screenshot A=BScreenshot A=BScreenshot A=BScreenshot A=BScreenshot A=B
« A cool game which can be played for free (and without excess keywords) by feeding "Markov algorithms online" query to your favorite search engine. »
👍 anonymous review · Sep 2026 · 3 h played1
« Great game! There's just the Ctrl+Z hotkey that undoes too much and the Ctrl+Y that redoes not enough. »
👍 anonymous review · Dec 2025 · 7 h played
« impressionnant, incroyable, interessant. »
👍 anonymous review · Feb 2025 · 8 h played
« Original, et n'importe qui peut s'y mettre »
👍 anonymous review · Nov 2023 · 8 h played
« trop cool pour les devs et les matheux! »
👍 anonymous review · May 2022 · 5 h played
« Très bon jeu pour celui qui aime se remuer le cerveau. Le principe est simple et la complexité se renforce au fil des niveaux, la petite histoire en fil rouge est assez marrante. Je le conseil à ceux qui on aimé TIS-100 dans le même style. »
👍 anonymous review · May 2022 · 6 h played
« It's okay but half way in the second area there is a huge difficulty spike to get over. »
👎 anonymous review · May 2024 · 7 h played
« The game could have been really fun if I could understand what it wants from me, but some puzzles are really poorly explained so I get stuck :( I didn't have such issues with other logic/programming games that I've played. »
👎 anonymous review · Apr 2024 · 1 h played
« As mentioned by quite a few reviewers, for quite a number of puzzles, the descriptions are poor, so the objectives and constraints are ambiguous. They seriously hampered the enjoyment of an otherwise a clever game. »
👎 anonymous review · Aug 2026 · 4 h played
« I'm sure that this is a great game, but I was too young to play it properly and cheated all of the answers. Don't make my mistake, either play it now or wait until you can. »
👎 anonymous review · Feb 2025 · 2 h played
« Clearly didn't understand premise. Mini game was incomprehensible. Deleted. »
👎 anonymous review · Mar 2026 · 0 h played
« good game but don't add music to the video on its store page if the game is completely soundless!!!!! »
👍 anonymous review · Jan 2025 · 2 h played

In players' words

« A cool game which can be played for free (and without excess keywords) by feeding "Markov algorithms online" query to your favorite search engine. »
👍 anonymous review · Sep 2026 · 3 h played1
« It's okay but half way in the second area there is a huge difficulty spike to get over. »
👎 anonymous review · May 2024 · 7 h played
« Great game! There's just the Ctrl+Z hotkey that undoes too much and the Ctrl+Y that redoes not enough. »
👍 anonymous review · Dec 2025 · 7 h played
« The game could have been really fun if I could understand what it wants from me, but some puzzles are really poorly explained so I get stuck :( I didn't have such issues with other logic/programming games that I've played. »
👎 anonymous review · Apr 2024 · 1 h played
« impressionnant, incroyable, interessant. »
👍 anonymous review · Feb 2025 · 8 h played
« As mentioned by quite a few reviewers, for quite a number of puzzles, the descriptions are poor, so the objectives and constraints are ambiguous. They seriously hampered the enjoyment of an otherwise a clever game. »
👎 anonymous review · Aug 2026 · 4 h played
« Original, et n'importe qui peut s'y mettre »
👍 anonymous review · Nov 2023 · 8 h played
« I'm sure that this is a great game, but I was too young to play it properly and cheated all of the answers. Don't make my mistake, either play it now or wait until you can. »
👎 anonymous review · Feb 2025 · 2 h played
« trop cool pour les devs et les matheux! »
👍 anonymous review · May 2022 · 5 h played
« Clearly didn't understand premise. Mini game was incomprehensible. Deleted. »
👎 anonymous review · Mar 2026 · 0 h played
« Très bon jeu pour celui qui aime se remuer le cerveau. Le principe est simple et la complexité se renforce au fil des niveaux, la petite histoire en fil rouge est assez marrante. Je le conseil à ceux qui on aimé TIS-100 dans le même style. »
👍 anonymous review · May 2022 · 6 h played
« good game but don't add music to the video on its store page if the game is completely soundless!!!!! »
👍 anonymous review · Jan 2025 · 2 h played

Anonymized excerpts from public Steam reviews — picked among those most voted "helpful" by the community.

What players say, by aspect

Positive Mixed Negative
Gameplay
86 % pos · n=88
Content / longevity
55 % pos · n=11
Story / writing
100 % pos · n=9
Value for money
88 % pos · n=8
Stability / bugs
0 % pos · n=4
Audio / music
33 % pos · n=3
Interface / UX
0 % pos · n=3
Performance
0 % pos · n=1
Detailed data (table)
AspectMentionsPositiveMixedNegative
Gameplay8876210
Content / longevity11605
Story / writing9900
Value for money8701
Stability / bugs4004
Audio / music3102
Interface / UX3003
Performance1001

Positive reviews by playtime

🎮 Players who like it have spent 8.9 h on median; those who dislike it: 1.9 h.

🪤 52 % of negative reviews come from players who left in under 2h — the game often disappoints right away.

<2h
75 % (n=59)
2-10h
94 % (n=171)
10-25h
99 % (n=99)
>25h
97 % (n=74)

Fixed or still broken? Sentiment over time

➡️ Stable reception over time
Jul 2023 : 90% positive90JulNov 2023 : 96% positive96NovFeb 2024 : 94% positive94FebMar 2024 : 100% positive100MarJan 2025 : 88% positive88JanOct 2025 : 100% positive100Oct

% of positive reviews per month (months with ≥ 15 sample reviews).

100% completion difficulty ("platinum")

3,1 % Demanding

of players have unlocked the rarest achievement — the upper bound of those who "100%'d" it. 18 achievements in total; the median achievement is unlocked by 5,3 % of players.

What creators say (YouTube)

No indexed video for this game yet.

See A=B videos on YouTube →

This game on Twitch

No stream or clip for this game right now.

See A=B streams on Twitch →

Strengths

  • The core puzzle design drives massive engagement, backed by 76 positive mentions out of 88 total for gameplay.
  • The clever programming mechanics resonate deeply with fans of logical challenges, appearing in 29 dedicated keyword highlights.
  • Pricing feels fair to the community, with 7 positive mentions out of 8 regarding its cost.
  • The narrative elements hit the right notes, earning 9 positive mentions out of 9 for the story.

Weaknesses

  • Interface design creates friction, cited by 3 negative mentions out of 3 for the UI.
  • Technical stability falters for some, accumulating 4 negative mentions out of 4 regarding bugs.
  • Content depth leaves certain players wanting more, reflected in 5 negative mentions out of 11.

Who is it for?

Code enthusiasts and logic puzzle fans who enjoy tackling abstract programming problems will find hours of satisfying mental exercise here.

Is A=B worth it in 2026?

Overall yes, the community is won over: 95% of 929 Steam reviews are positive (player score 91/100). Most-praised strength: The core puzzle design drives massive engagement, backed by. Current price: 3,63€ (30% off).

Verdict

This clever programming puzzle game delivers a rewarding challenge that improves the longer you stick with it. Despite minor interface and bug hurdles, the overwhelmingly favorable reception proves it is a must-play for logical thinkers.

Display this score

This game's player score, as a badge you can embed on your site or page.

Show the badge and the embed code
A=B: 91/100 by players — Gamer Reviews

Most frequent keywords

programmation (29)difficile (13)puzzles (8)esolang (8)original (8)zachtronics (8)puzzle (7)logique (6)réflexion (6)recommandé (5)humour (5)excellent (3)

Similar games